No bird could want to sing in a desert.
One of the very useful practices to be included and of course to be assumed culturally, however been barely established, is the link between the collection of forest residues and their use in fertilization, by mixing it with other organic fertilizers. This practice takes even more sense when we look at the fire that so many forests suffer, the most of them mono-crops.
Once more, I emphasize the importance of linking the apparently independent fields:
WILDFIRES + FOREST MANAGEMENT + WATER RETENTION + JOB OF FORESTERS + FOREST GOODS + EROSION + SETTLEMENTS + BIODIVERSITY + LOCAL FUTURE + FOREST RESIDUES + MANURES + FERTILIZATION + FARMS + JOB OF AGRONOMISTS + MARKET + SERVICES + GOODS + ALL THAT YOU WANT IMAGINE.
Better than words, I’ll show you a silent movie, when people (not nature, people) take decisions: and the final outcome for those actions. You decide, you bet. If you’re living near a forest, you can’t imagine what is there, far away from your home: but is there, figures don’t lie.
Moreover, right practices conduct you to be able to have on your hands a brown gold: organic matter, so needed, disappearing in so many fields around you, where modern technified farmers replace a free natural process for a payment process, the chemical fertilization. And it’s only the peak of an iceberg. What stays down, still becomes more expensive.
